One good way this idea can be put into practice is by educating security professionals on hostile planning, conducting surveillance mapping of secured properties, and training security officers on how to look, where to look and what to look for.
With this idea in mind, it seems quite odd that the enormous security camera sector – an industry that ironically contains the term “Surveillance Cameras” – knows so little about hostile surveillance, and about the large role the industry can play in combating it.
To be fair, security cameras do have many useful applications that go far beyond security, but what’s so surprising is that in the majority of properties, even some with quite serious security concerns, there appears to be a huge gap between what security camera systems can do to address hostile surveillance, and what they actually end up doing. I keep encountering highly secured facilities, with highly professional security teams – teams that know quite a bit about hostile surveillance, but that have to operate security camera systems that had been installed beforehand with absolutely no regard to hostile planning.
Just to make matters clear, security cameras by themselves cannot be relied upon to prevent criminal activity, much less criminal planning, but they still have some important roles to play. Even in cases where the only role that has been given to a security camera system is an after-the-fact one – helping to understand what happened and helping to compile evidence – what can be more important than understanding how an attack was planned, if the goal is to prevent the next attack? How can one hope to record, let alone to understand, hostile surveillance (who conducted it, how it was done, how long it took, etc), if security cameras aren’t even pointed in the right direction to record any of it?
The field of security cameras has been advancing at an amazing rate, and anyone who has had the privilege of attending a security convention in recent years (ASIS, ISC, etc) can attest to the staggering amount of highly advanced systems that are on the market. But even the most advanced system, connected to the highest quality cameras on the market, has very little preventative value if an installer does not know, or has not been instructed on, where to point the cameras in the first place. In much the same way, even the most advanced weapon system will be quite useless in the hands of someone who doesn’t know where to point it. No amount of megapixels, or storage capacity, or AI analytics, or programmable, multi-zoned, fully integrated IP capabilities can overcome the basic problem of not knowing where cameras should be pointed in the first place.
Too often it seems that security camera technicians install cameras with about as much foresight and security understanding as that of electricians installing lighting systems. In point of fact, the word “coverage” is often used by both fields in order to unfortunately describe much the same thing – the simple blanketing of areas with either lighting or footage, or both. Actually, the word “coverage” should probably not even be used to describe what security cameras do, since unlike lighting, which emanates from the device and “covers” an area, footage goes the opposite direction – emanating from the area, and getting reflected towards the camera.Lest it seem like I’m some old fashioned security type complaining about “toys and gadgets”, let me assure you that the opposite is the case. I have a great deal of respect for this very important industry, and know very well, from years of experience, just how effective it can be when its true potential is properly utilized. My point here is not to denigrate this industry but rather to encourage it – from installers, technicians and security directors, through system designers, manufacturers and sales representatives, to upgrade the industry by learning about hostile planning, and to unleash the true capabilities of this important sector.